Admin

Posted by

David Bauder (AP) David Bauder (AP)
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Share

More than half of Americans pay for news

Rate this item
(0 votes)
More than half of Americans pay for news (AP file photo)

NEW YORK — A battered news industry can find some flickers of hope in a survey that gauges public willingness to pay for journalism, as long as its leaders plan judiciously.

A little more than half of American adults regularly pay for news, through newspaper and magazine subscriptions, apps on electronic devices or contributions to public media, according to the Media Insight Project, a collaboration between the American Press Institute and The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

It’s not only greybeards, either. Although they’re less likely than their parents’ generation to subscribe, close to four in 10 people under age 35 also pay. Younger people are also more likely to express a desire to support a news organization’s mission as a reason for subscribing, the project’s study found.

On the other hand, young adults who don’t pay for news are especially likely to say they’re just not very interested in the content that’s for sale.

“We sense a shift,” said Tom Rosenstiel, executive director of the American Press Institute. “There’s this perception that people don’t want to pay for news, especially young people, because they can get things from social media ... We found that’s not true.”

A quarter of people who confess to regularly tapping a news source for free said they’d be at least moderately likely to pay for the information if they had to pay.

Chicago resident John Ashford subscribes to a handful of news organizations online, partly because of the work’s importance. He said the truth behind a police shooting near where he lived likely would have remained hidden if not for reporters digging in to the story.

“People don’t have the time and the money to investigate what is going on,” he said. “You have to have somebody to do it.”

Nearly one in five Americans donate money to at least one nonprofit media source, such as public television or radio, or a digital news site such as ProPublica, the study found.

The New York Times saw slow and steady growth in its digital subscriptions from 406,000 at the end of 2011 to 1.09 million at the end of 2015. During 2016, the number of subscriptions shot up to 1.85 million, the Times said, a spurt contrary to President Trump’s assertion that the Times is “failing.”

Even before the postelection controversy over fake news, the Times found new subscribers who were concerned about the reliability of some stories they saw online and “they understood that you get what you pay for,” said David Rubin, senior vice president and head of brand for the newspaper.

Rather than simply tout what a subscriber would receive, the Times is running an advertising campaign that focuses on the news organization’s mission and the importance of journalism, including one that shows the dangers faced by a photojournalist covering the conflict between Iraqi forces and the Islamic State.

The newspaper also recognizes the importance of building a relationship with subscribers, instead of simply making sure an article is seen by as many eyeballs as possible, Rubin said.

Three-quarters of newspaper subscribers say they primarily read the product in print, while 21 percent said they see it online, the study found. News executives can’t afford to focus on one type of consumer at the expense of another, Rosenstiel said.

The biggest reason people choose to subscribe is because they believe a news organization excels at covering issues they care about. Executives looking to cut costs need to consider the importance subscribers place in quality, he said.

“Spreading the pain equally so you get a little worse at everything is probably a bad strategy,” he said. “You’ve got to be more surgical.”

The poll of 2,199 adults was conducted Feb. 16 through March 20 with funding from the American Press Institute. It used a sample drawn from NORC’s probability-based AmeriSpeak panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for all respondents is plus or minus 2.7 percentage points.

Respondents were first selected randomly using address-based sampling methods, and later interviewed online or by phone.

21 comments

  • Comment Link Jordan Friday, 08 September 2017 19:47 posted by Jordan

    Superb, what a website it is! This weblog presents helpful facts to us, keep it up.

  • Comment Link Sienna Wednesday, 23 August 2017 00:57 posted by Sienna

    Hi there! This is my first visit to your blog!
    We are a group of volunteers and starting a new project in a
    community in the same niche. Your blog provided us useful information to work on. You
    have done a wonderful job!

  • Comment Link Victoria Monday, 21 August 2017 00:20 posted by Victoria

    you're in reality a just right webmaster. The web site
    loading pace is amazing. It seems that you're doing any distinctive trick.
    Also, The contents are masterpiece. you have performed a magnificent job in this matter!

  • Comment Link Crystal Sunday, 20 August 2017 05:54 posted by Crystal

    A fascinating discussion is worth comment. I do believe that
    you ought to publish more about this subject, it might not
    be a taboo subject but typically folks don't speak about
    these topics. To the next! Many thanks!!

  • Comment Link Krystal Saturday, 19 August 2017 08:45 posted by Krystal

    Very nice article, exactly what I needed.

  • Comment Link Margot Monday, 14 August 2017 20:35 posted by Margot

    These are genuinely wonderful ideas in regarding blogging.
    You have touched some nice points here. Any way keep up wrinting.

  • Comment Link Kirk Thursday, 03 August 2017 17:28 posted by Kirk

    I have read so many posts on the topic of the blogger lovers however this
    article is genuinely a good post, keep it up.

  • Comment Link Angelo Thursday, 03 August 2017 09:35 posted by Angelo

    Thank you for the good writeup. It in fact was a amusement account
    it. Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! By the way,
    how could we communicate?

  • Comment Link Meagan Thursday, 27 July 2017 02:50 posted by Meagan

    Wow, wonderful blog structure! How lengthy have you ever been blogging for?
    you make running a blog look easy. The entire glance of your site is excellent,
    as smartly as the content material!

  • Comment Link Edna Saturday, 22 July 2017 15:53 posted by Edna

    Excellent goods from you, man. I've have in mind your stuff prior to and you're simply too excellent.
    I actually like what you've received right here, really like
    what you're stating and the way in which wherein you
    say it. You are making it entertaining and you still care for to
    stay it sensible. I can't wait to read much more from you.
    This is really a tremendous web site.

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

Advertisements

Website CMS and Development by Links Online Marketing, LLC, Bangor Maine